PDF

Kulcsszavak

közigazgatás, demokratizáció, tranzitológia, intervenció, organikus demokráciafelfogás

Absztrakt

A magyar igazgatási kultúrát hagyományosan jogiasnak, eljárásiasnak szokás nevezni, ami – úgy tűnik – ellentétben van azokkal az álláspontokkal, hogy Magyarországon megrendült volna a jogállam intézményrendszere, és hazánkat az Európai Unió Szerződésének 7. cikkelye alapján emiatt szankcionálni kellene. Ez mű áttekintést kínál azokról az akadémiai (tudományos) irányzatokról, amelyek a magyar fejlődési pályát a demokratizáció folyamatában ábrázolják leíró vagy normatív jelleggel: ide tartoznak a tranzitológiai, demokrácia-exportot szorgalmazó irányzatok.

A cikk összehasonlítja az 1970-es évektől kezdődő, kortárs intervencionista irányzatokat az organikus fejlődési pályával, amelyek közül Joseph Ratzinger megközelítését alapvetőnek tekinti.

Az intervencionista és az organikus megközelítés közötti határvonal pontos kijelölése különösen a demokratizáló célzatú közvetlen beavatkozások tapasztalatai fényében szükséges.

https://doi.org/10.54230/Delib.2023.1.26
PDF

Hivatkozások

Ágh, A. (1975a). A marxi történetfilozófia alakulása [The development of Marxian philosophy on history]. Akadémiai Publisher.

Ágh, A. (1975b). Bevezetés a marxizmus-leninizmus társadalom és történetelméletébe [In- troduction to the societal and historical theory of Marxism-Leninism]. Oktatási Minisztérium Marxizmus-Leninizmus Oktatási Főosztálya [Department for The Education of Marxism-Leninism, Ministry of Education].

Ágh, A. (2012). Demokráciakutatás a politikai és közpolitikai elemzés keresztútján: a demokráciák minősége és teljesítőképessége. Politikatudományi Szemle, 21(2), 55-72.

Ágh, A. (2013a). Bumpy road of the Hungarian administrative reforms: From political over-centralization to public policy failures. Politika i Uprava. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 13(4), 1115–1136.

Ágh, A. (2013b). The triple crisis in Hungary: The “Backsliding” of Hungarian Democ- racy after Twenty Years. Romanian Journal of Political Science (PolSci), 13(1), 25–51.

Ágh, A. et al. (1984). Szocialista orientáció [Socialist orientation]. Kossuth Pub- lisher.

Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture. Princeton.

Anderson, J.H., Bernstein, D.S., & Gray, Ch.W. (2005). Judicial Systems in Transitional Economies. Assessing the Past, Looking to the Future. The World Bank. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/7351/329 280Judicial0Sys01public1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Letöltés: 08 August 2021).

Appel, H. (2019). Can the EU stop Eastern Europe’s illiberal turn? Critical Review, 31(3–4), 255–266.

Ballin, E.H. (2020). Advanced introduction to legal research methods. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Barker, E. (1942). Reflections on Government. Oxford.

Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory. George Braziller.

Borvendég, Z. (2020a). Az impexek kora [The age of impexes]. Kárpátia Stúdió Publisher.

Borvendég, Z. (2020b) Mesés kémjátszmák. A nyugati külkereskedelmi hálózatok kiépülése 1945 után [Fabulous spy games. Building up western foreign trade networks after 1945.] Budapest: Magyarságkutató Intézet. Available at: http://mek.oszk.hu/21300/21398/21398. pdf (Letöltés: 01 August 2021).

Capra, F., & Mattei, U. (2015). The Ecology of Law. Toward a Legal System in Tune with Nature and Community. Berrett Koehler Publishers.

Civil Jogász Bizottság jelentése a 2006 szeptember-októberi emberi jogsértésekről. [Report of the Civic Lawyer Commission on the breaches of human rights September-October, 2006]. Kairosz Publisher, 2007.

Closa, C. (2019). The politics of guarding the Treaties: Commission scrutiny of rule of law compliance. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(5), 696–716.

Coman, R. (2014). Quo vadis judicial reforms? The quest for judicial independence in Central and Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(6), 892–924, doi: 10.1080/ 09668136.2014.905385

Cutright, Ph. (1963). National political development: Measurement and analysis. American Sociological Review, 28(4).

Diamond, L., Linz, J.J., & Lipset, S.M. (1989). Democracy in developing countries. Vol. 4, Latin America. Boulder, Co.: Lynne Rienner and Adamantine Press.

Donáth, A. J. (2021). Absolutely Corrupted. The Rise of an Illiberal System and the Future of Hungarian Democracy. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 27(2), 83-104.

Drechsler, W. (2005). The rise and demise of the new public management. Post-Autistic Economics Review, 33(9).

Farazmand, A. Chaos, & Transformation Theories. (2003). A Theoretical Analysis with Implications for Organization Theory and Public Management. Public Organization Review 3, 339–372. doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000004814.35884.a3

Fukuyama, F. (2012). The weakness of liberal populism, In Garfinkle, A. (Ed.), Plutocracy & democracy. How money corrupts our politics and culture. The American Interest EBOOK.

Fukuyama, F. (2015). Political order and political decay. From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

Gellén, M (2018). Development Path of Decentralization and Centralization in the Hugarian Public Administration. CIPFA Japan,12(2), 59-72. http://www.cipfa.jp/pg257.html

Gurland, R.L. (1949). Why democracy is losing in Germany. Commentary, 8(9), 227–37.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Polity Press.

Habermas, J., & Ratzinger, J. (2007). Dialectics of secularisation: On reason and religion. Ignatius Press.

Hajnal, G. (2003). Diversity and convergence: a quantitative analysis of European public administration educational programs, Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(4), 245–258.

Hajnal, G. (2008). Public management reforms: Hungary. In Bouckaert, G., Nemec, J., et al. (Eds.), Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. NISPAcee Press, pp. 121–150.

Hajnal, G. (2014). Public administration education in Europe: Continuity or reorientation? Teaching Public Administration. Published online:

Hazony, Y. (2018). The virtue of nationalism. Basic Books.

Hellquist, E. (2019). Ostracism and the EU’s contradictory approach to sanctions at home and abroad, Contemporary Politics, 25(4), 393–418.

Hintea, C., Ringsmuth, D., & Mora, C. (2006). The reform of the higher education pub- lic administration programs in the context of public administration reform in Romania. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16(E), 40–46.

Huber, D., & Pisciotta, B. (2023). From democracy to hybrid regime. Democratic backsliding and populism in Hungary and Tunisia. Contemporary Politics, 29(3), 357-378. doi: 10.1080/13569775.2022.2162210.

Huntington, S.P. (1984). Will more countries become democratic? Political Science Quarterly, 99(2), 193–218.

Ignatieff, M. (2005). Who are Americans to think that freedom is theirs to spread? New York Times Magazine, June 26, 42–47.

Kazai, V.Z. (2021). The misuse of the legislative process as part of the illiberal toolkit. The case of Hungary. The Theory and Practice of Legislation. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/20508840.2021.1942366

Kelemen, D.R. (2017). Europe’s other democratic deficit: National authoritarianism in Eu- rope’s democratic union. Government and Opposition, 52(2), 211–238.

Kelemen, D.R., & Blauberger (2016). Introducing the debate: European Union safe- guards against member states’ democratic Michael backsliding. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 317–320.

Kinzer, S. (2007). Overthrow. America’s century of regime change from Hawaii to Iraq. Times Books.

Kochenov, D.V. (2008). EU enlargement and the failure of conditionality. Pre-accession Conditionality in the fields of democracy and the rule of law. Kluwer Law International.

Kochenov, D.V. (2016). The commission vs Poland: The sovereign state is winning 1-0. VerfBlog, 2016 January 25.

Kornai, J. (1996). Paying the bill for goulash communism: Hungarian development and macro stabilization in a political- economy perspective. Social Research, 63(4), 943–1040.

Körösényi, A. (2019). The Theory and Practice of Plebiscitary Leadership: Weber and the Orbán regime. East European Politics and Societies, 33(2), 280-301.

Körösényi, A., Illés G., & Gyulai, A. (2020). The Orbán Regime: Plebiscitary Leader Democracy in the Making. Routledge, pp. 2-8.

László, E. (1972). The System View of the World. George Braziller.

Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. The Free Press.

Levi, E.H. (1948). An introduction to legal reasoning. University of Chicago Law Review, 15 (3), 573–574.

Lipset, S.M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(3).

Luca, D., & Proietti, P. (2022). Hosting to skim: organized crime and the reception of asylum seekers in Italy. Regional Studies, 56(12), 2102-2116, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2039386

Morçöl, G. (2014). A complexity theory for public policy. Routledge.

Möllers, T. M. J. (2023). Juristische Methodenlehre. C.H.BECK.

Orenstein, M.A., Bloom, S., & Lindstrom, N. (2008). A fourth dimension of transition. In Orenstein, M.A., Bloom, S. and Lindstrom N. (Eds.), Transnational actors in Central and East European Transitions. University of Pittsburgh Press, p. 2.

Ovádek, M. (2018). The rule of law in the EU: Many ways forward but only one way to stand still? Journal of European Integration, 40(4), 495–503.

Payne, J.L. (2006). Did the Unites States create democracy in Germany? The Independent Review, 11(2), 209–221.

Pech, L., & Scheppele, K.L. (2017a). Poland and the European Commission. Par I: A dialogue of the deaf, VerfBlog, 3 January 2021.

Pech, L., & Scheppele, K.L. (2017b). Illiberalism within: Rule of law backsliding in the EU. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 3–47.

Perl, J. M. (2007). A ”Dictatorship or Relativism”? Symposium in Response to Cardinal Ratzinger’s Last Homily. Editor’s Note. Common Knowledge, 13(2-3).

Pollitt, C. (2003). Public management reform: Reliable knowledge and international expe- rience. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(3),121–136.

Ratzinger, J. (2007). Europe today and tomorrow. Addressing the fundamental issues. Kindle edition. Ignatius Press.

Rech, W. (2018). Some remarks on the EU’s action on the erosion of the rule of law in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(3), 334–345.

Ropret, M., Aristovnik, A., & Kovac, P. (2018). A content analysis of the rule of law with- in public governance models: Old vs. new EU member states. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 11(2), 129–152.

Rustow, A.D. (1970). Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics, 2(3), 337–363.

Share, D. (1987). Transitions to democracy and transition through transaction. Comparative Political Studies, 19(4), 525–548.

Shiva, V. (2015). Earth democracy. Justice, sustainability and peace. North Atlantic Books.

Sobis I., & de Vries, M.S. (2009). The story behind the Western advice to Central Europe during its transition period. NISPA CEE Press.

Soyaltin-Colella, D. (2020). The EU’s ’actions-without-sanctions?’ The politics of the rule of law crisis in many Europes. European Politics and Societies, 22(3),1–17. doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1842698

Stiglitz, J.E. (2017). The Euro. How a common currency threatens the future of Europe. Updated edition. W. W. Norton & Co.

Szpak. A., & Bunikowski, P. (2022). Saami truth and reconciliation commissions. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(2), 306-331, doi: 10.1080/13642987.2021.1926237