The Second Vatican Council and subsequent documents, in view of the pastoral challenges, strongly recommend the establishment of a pastoral council in the dioceses, in which mainly the laity should be involved. The role of the council is to
raise and discuss issues related to pastoral work and to reach practical conclusions.
There was also a great need at the parish level for the establishment of a pastoral council, the task and competence of which were similar to that of the diocesan pastoral council. Current magisterial declarations also urge the conversion of parish
communities, in which the pastoral council has a significant role to play.
An examination of the diocesan and parish pastoral advisory bodies raises the question of whether the legal structure of the pastoral council at these two levels shows only an analogous or rather deeper theological connection. Do these councils
have a theological basis formulated by the Council? What impact does the particular mission of the faithful arising from the universal priesthood have on emphasizing representation, and is this sufficiently reflected in the legislation pertaining these
councils? Should the question of the relationship between the bishop and his commissioned cleric and the members of the council be examined on the basis of the centralization or decentralization of power, or should we rather start from the reality
of the theological structure of communio?
The examination of the theological and legal basis of pastoral councils provides answers to the questions formulated above, as well as to present the Hungarian peculiarity which is also a special feature in international law, that is, the Parish
Board of Representatives which performs the task of the parish pastoral council.
Arrieta, J. I. (1981). El régimen jurídico de los Consejos Presbiteral y Pastoral. Ius Canonicum, 21(42), 567–605.
Aymans, W., Mörsdorf, K. (1991). Kanonisches Recht I. Paderborn.
Borras, A. (1995). Petite grammaire canonique des nouveaux ministres. Nouvelle Revue
Théologique, 117(2), 240–261.
Coriden, J. A., Green, Th. J., Heintschel, D. E. (1985). The Code of Canon Law. A text and commentary. New York–Mahwah.
Denis, J. (1967). L’Église diocésaine et la lumière de Vatican II, le Conseil du presbyterium et le Conseil diocésain de pastorale. Studia Canonica, 1(1), 185–193.
Erdő, P. (1982). Tanácsok, bizottságok és más pasztorális szervek a zsinat utáni egyházjogban. Teológia, 16(4), 244–246.
Erdő, P. (1993). A világiak munkája a plébánián. Távlatok, 3(12–13), 632–635.
Erdő, P. (1996). Az Egyházjog Teológiája intézménytörténeti megközelítésben. Budapest.
Ferenc Pápa. (2014). Evangelii Gaudium. SZIT.
Fischer, M. (1999). What Was Vatican II’s Intent Regarding Parish Councils?. Studia canonica, 33(1), 5–25.
Gaudemet, J. (1973). Sur la co-responsabilité. L’Année Canonique, 17(1), 533–541.
Griese, O. (1985). The New Code of Canon Law and Parish Councils. Homiletic and Pastoral Review, 85(4), 47–53.
Kléruskongregáció. (2003). A pap mint a plébániai közösség pásztora és vezetője. Római Dokumentumok XXIII.
Kléruskongregáció. (2020). A plébániai közösségek lelkipásztori konverziója az egyház evangelizáló küldetésének szolgálatában. Római dokumentumok LIV.
Kránitz, M. (2019). Keresztény egység. Budapest.
Magyar Katolikus Püspöki Konferencia. (1993). A Magyarországi Egyházközségi Képviselő Testületek Szabályzata. DM Nyomda.
Paulus VI. Motu Proprio Ecclesiae Sanctae. (1966). In L. Erminio (Ed.), Enchiridion Vaticanum. (696–769). Edizione Dehoniane.
Renken, J. (1993). Pastoral Councils: Pastoral Planning and Dialogue among the People of God. The Jurist, 53(1), 132–154.
Sacra Congregatio Pro Episcopis. (2004). Directorium Apostolorum Successores. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
Witsch, N. (2004). Synodalitat auf Ebene der Diözese. Die Bestimmungen des universalkirchlichen Rechts der Lateinischen Kriche. Padenborg.